Indulgence
They say that one of the signs of being a person that rises above the rest is adaptability. Looking at change, adversity, disappointment, and seeing not failure or frustration, but opportunity; hope that something better will come as a result of the new, unforseen path that life inevitably takes.
Still, letting go is difficult. Attaching yourself to ideas, to institutions, to plans that can change within the blink of an eye is a risk for everyone. Allowing those same ideas, institutions and plans to evolve--possibly into something you would never have originally contemplated is difficult. In an odd way, those intangible investments are a part of you, and to see them tossed to the wayside is even painful, and certainly discouraging. You want to indulge yourself--to refuse to change, to stand still and appreciate the comfort of the plans that you have invested in.
Unfortunately, we're not here to indulge our pride. Nor are we here to avoid risk. We're here to change the world, and that cannot be accomplished by resisiting change, cowering from adversity, or caving to frustration. We need to let go and follow where the changes in life lead--as James says, "Go to now, ye that say, To day or to morrow we will go into such a city, and continue there a year, and buy and sell, and get gain: Whereas ye know not what shall be on the morrow. For what is your life? It is even a vapour, that appeareth for a little time, and then vanisheth away." As all things lay in the hands of our God, how can we desire our original path over the new one that presents itself?
Sigh. Knowing this truth doesn't make it easier. But, hopefully, its enough to make us act; truth used to be enough to compel men to act. Now we have surrendered the idea of truth, as Screwtape says, so that we have conflicting "truths" floating simultaneously in our heads without ever realizing the dilemma that places us in. However--this is a truth...and indulgence is false hope, a fool's pride. And if we are ever to grow, we cannot indulge ourselves forever.
I am flawed...but I am cleaning up so well.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Chris,
A nice post with some challenging thoughts, but there are a couple of things I take issue with.
First, as Christians, we're not here to change the world, but to live for the glory of God. If while attempting to live that out we happen to change the world, that's a pleasant side effect. Paul was said in Acts to be "turning the world upside-down" with his teaching, but that wasn't the primary goal of his life. The primary goal was to "do all unto the glory of God" (1 Corinthians 10:31).
Second, I believe you're taking that passage in James out of context (James 4:1-4 I believe). That passage isn't talking about "letting go and following where the changes in life are leading." It's talking about the brevity of life and not presuming on the grace of God ("If the Lord wills, we will do such-and-such").
Otherwise, it's an excellent post.
Carl.
Carl,
First, thanks for the comments. I hope you keep reading!
In answer to your comments; it seems that really the disagreements you have revolve around my use of language, yes? Let me see if I can clear my intended meaning up...
I agree with you--"changing the world" is not strictly stated as the point of our life on earth--in all things our goal is to bring glory to God. However, when Christians do live a life to glorify God, the world changes. Its not merely a side-effect--its a fact. A life devoted to praising God and honoring God and glorifying God will necessarily have a wake in this world--especially in our self-centered world today. SO when I say its our goal, I was presuming it within the context of living the life that honors God above all else.
With regard to James--I would agree that the first lesson to take away from his words are that God's grace is not to be presummed. I just drew from that the follow-up thought that with that in mind, we need to realize that our plans are to be subject to God's will--and that may change the direction we originally intended to go in. When that happens, we need to properly realize that, as James says, we are almost nothing--phantoms that move with the wind to God's immoveable might. In that way--just as we should not presume the Grace of God to correlate with our own designs, we should understand that when the will of God moves our appropriate response needs to be one that accepts and follows.
Does that make sense? Reading your thoughts I didn't find anything I disagreed with--so I imagine the differences stem more from language. I appreciate your feedback--and would love to discuss more.
Chris
Post a Comment